I recently began the practice of Lectio Divina, an ancient form of Christian prayer. As described by my spiritual director, it comprises four phases, or “moments:” reading, meditation, affective prayer, and contemplative prayer (lectio, meditatio, oratio, and contemplatio). In it, one reads and reflects on Scripture to prepare one for the gift of the presence of God.
Lectio
Although many people who practice this will work their way through a particular book of the Bible, I like to use the Scripture selections prescribed in the Daily Lectionary of the Episcopal Church, which was my spiritual home for 25 years until my conviction as a Quaker last year. I read until a verse “jumps out” at me, then stop and move into meditation.
Today I didn’t get past the first reading: Psalm 78: 1-39, and, in fact, it was the second half of verse 19 that stopped me, in the section describing the hard-heartedness of the people of Ephraim (vv. 18-19):
They tested God in their heart
by demanding the food they craved.
They spoke against God, saying,
“Can God spread a table in the wilderness?”
Meditatio
The form of meditation my director recommended was simply to repeat the verse that spoke to me with different emphases, to see how the meaning changes, and what questions and emotions come up for me. Some were more compelling than others, of course, and what follows is a bare outline of the meditation.
“Can God spread a table in the wilderness?”
Do I really believe that God can provide for me even in dry periods, like now?
“Can God spread a table in the wilderness?”
Do I expect someone or something else to do so? Who or what might that be? Have I set up an idol in some way?
“Can God spread a table in the wilderness?”
Here the word “spread” connotes abundance to me. Do I expect no more than a withered prickly-pear, rather than a banquet? In the wilderness of Exodus, God sent the Israelites manna and quail, the latter to a depth of two cubits all around their camp (Ex. 16:13-31, Num. 11:31). Do I expect less?
“Can God spread a table in the wilderness?”
Abundance again, and faithfulness. Do I believe he will do it again and again?
“Can God spread a table in the wilderness?”
Do I believe it will come in a form I can recognize? Am I willing to look for it?
“Can God spread a table in the wilderness?”
Do I believe that it will be where I am, where I need it?
“Can God spread a table in the wilderness?”
I didn’t much care for what came up for this. “You mean there’s more than one?”
“Can God spread a table in the wilderness?”
Am I afraid that while God is there in the good times, he’s not there in the bad times?
Oratio
In the next phase, one moves into affective prayer, trying to be present with the questions and emotions that one has discerned. The Wikipedia article describes this moment well: “This is not primarily an intellectual exercise, but more of the beginning of a conversation with God.”
Contemplatio
Finally, one comes to the phase that most Quakers will feel most at home with: contemplative prayer. I am learning this as taught by Thomas Keating, who calls it “centering prayer.” Its form is simple, its practice far from easy, especially at first.
1) Get comfortable, in a place free of distraction.
2) Form the intent to consent to the presence and action of God.
3) As thoughts come up, don’t suppress them, but simply let them pass through your mind. Keating uses the simile of standing on the banks of a river, watching the boats go by. If you find yourself climbing into a boat to rummage through the hold, step back onto the bank. To do so, use a “holy word” you have selected beforehand, preferably one syllable, and not freighted with meaning. It’s simply a way to return to the center, to remind yourself of your intention of consent.
4) Most important, if something comes up, let it pass as well! Keating makes the point that any spiritual illumination has already done its work the moment you become aware of it. Chewing on it will only distract you: if you need to remember it, you will. If feelings come up, observe and let go.
He recommends that one practice centering prayer twice a day for twenty minutes each time. I can only manage fifteen minutes once a day right now (not always preceded by the other three phases), but even so, I find it rewarding.
Finally, I find that doing lectio divina as an introduction to Meeting for Worship is a wonderful way to center down. I imagine that one could use a similar process no matter what one’s faith tradition is.
What spiritual practice brings you into the Light?




5 Comments
Write a Comment»Yeah that’s great insight, one of my best friends is an Episcopalian and we’ve had the same conversation…very, interesting.
Thanks, Wess. “Mashups” is a great term.
I was talking recently to the former rector of the Episcopal church I used to attend, and, upon finding that I was now a Quaker, she commented that it seemed to her that it wasn’t uncommon to hear of Episcopalians becoming Quakers, or vice versa. We speculated that it was because both traditions are comfortable with questions, and don’t demand certainty.
Dave, Great post! I love doing lectio and often use the book of common prayers to supplement my own reflections. I love seeing “mashups” like this, seeing Quakers use Episcopalian stuff, or Catholic stuff gets me really excited.
I’m glad you found me, Hedwyg. I watched Riverstone for several months, wondering if you were coming back. I’m glad to see you again, too.
It’s funny that I only discovered lectio divina after leaving the Episcopal Church, with its catholic traditions, and becoming a Quaker, a church that historically has been very suspicious of any form of non-spontaneous worship. (As the joke goes, I left organized religion and became a Quaker.)
I imagine the Farewell Discourses will be a very rich source of meditation and contemplation. My own relationship with the Gospel of John has been a rocky one–I have much preferred Mark’s story. However, after reading Jesus and the Eyewitnesses: The Gospels as Eyewitness Testimony, by Richard Bauckham, I’m feeling a little more comfortable with it, as he makes a good case for that gospel being the work of an actual disciple of Jesus (not, however, John, son of Zebedee, but another John not in the “inner circle” of the 12), rather than a narrative composed from the reports of eyewitnesses a generation (at least) removed, as with the Synoptics.
Dave! How glad I am to find your new blog! I can’t tell you how disappointed I was to find Redwood Dragon having, erm, issues a couple weeks ago. I’m so happy to see you posting again. I have followed your journey through the Episcopal Church into the Quakers, who have long inspired me.
The practice of lectio divina can be such an incredible grace. Heck, just about any intentional practice of engaging with scripture can be an incredible grace, but I have found very deep meaning and insights through lectio. I try to keep a daily practice of lectio during Lent, but am not so good at honoring that practice during the rest of the year. This Lent, I plan to start in the Farewell Discourses in John - and, as you mentioned, I’ll just read with open mind and heart (slowing my pace intentionally to read each word as it comes, rather than devouring the page all at once) until a phrase captures my attention and draws me in.
Peace be with you, Brother. I’m glad to “see” you again!
Blessings,
Hedwyg (formerly known as RiverStone)